
Now, hackers at Vietnamese cybersecurity firm Bkav say that the biometric security feature is less secure than Apple has suggested - and claimed to have fooled it with a mask made from $150 (£114) in supplies.
Back in 2016, the FBI paid more than $1m to a non-government party to hack into the phone of the San Bernadino shooter.
Bkav's claims come despite Apple's statement that the engineering team had collaborated with "professional mask makers and make-up artists in Hollywood to protect against these attempts to beat Face ID".
Mr Ngo Tuan Anh, the company's vice president of cybersecurity, said the team created the mask using a combination of "3D printing with make-up and 2D images" to dupe the facial recognition system.
It is not known however whether the researchers had disabled Apple's Attention Aware feature, and what effect that may have had on the mask's success in fooling Face ID.
Onlookers have criticised the company for a lack of information regarding whether the mask was registered with the phone, or if the phone had been trained to recognise it over multiple failed attempts.
The frame of the face was created with 3D printing, with the nose being produced by a third-party artist and moulded in silicone.
Other than that, the eyes were represented with printed 2D images, with a little extra special processing done on the cheeks and other areas of the face where there are large areas of skin.
Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Speaking to Sky News on background the company directed us to its existing information on the "Face ID advanced technology".
Bkav's researchers said that the iPhone X's fingerprint sensor was the most secure biometric security feature.
Post a Comment
Click to see the code!
To insert emoticon you must added at least one space before the code.